ABSTRACT
Introduction: Aberdeen Royal Infirmary is a low volume centre carrying out approximately 13 oesophagectomies per annum. Due to minimal exposure to post-operative oesophagectomy patients, staff had low perceived confidence in their management within the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). After an initial pause due to the COVID-19 pandemic, oesophagectomy service provision restarted in June 2020. Prior to this project, no standardised care pathway existed for post-operative oesophagectomy patients. A protocol driven management pathway was implemented within the ICU setting in October 2020. Objective(s): 1. Standardise the first 5 days of post-operative care for oesophagectamies 2. Improve 30 day mortality rate 3. Reduce opiate use on step down to High Dependency Unit (HDU) 4. Improve ICU Medical and Nursing staff perceived confidence in the management of oesophagectomy patients. Method(s): A multi-disciplinary approach was taken, with input from ICU, Surgical, Anaesthetic, Physiotherapy, Nursing, Pain and HDU teams. Standards of care for post-operative oesophagectomy patients were identified and a protocol was subsequently produced for use within ICU with reference to current Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines.1 The protocol covered the first 5 days of post-operative care. It identified tasks to be completed each day and highlighted which staff group was responsible for performing each task. Additionally, an information sheet was distributed to Medical and Nursing ICU staff to educate them on oesophagectomy patients and recognition of potential complications that arise when caring for this patient group. Data on 30 day mortality and opiate use at step down to HDU was collected from electronic notes. This was collected retrospectively prior to implementation of the protocol from January 2019 - July 2020 and prospectively following its implementation, from October 2020 - December 2021. ICU staff perceived confidence in managing post-operative oesophagectomy patients was measured using a combined quiz and survey. It was completed by staff prior to introduction of the protocol. Following implementation of the protocol and distribution of the information sheet, the quiz and survey was repeated to evaluate improvement in staff confidence. Result(s): A total of 38 oesophagectomy cases were identified. 21 cases were reviewed prior to implementation of the protocol, with 1 mortality at 30 days. 17 cases were reviewed following implementation of the protocol, with 0 mortalities at 30 days. Qualitative scoring showed a 20% increase in staff confidence to manage this patient group. Review of drug prescription charts revealed a reduction in dose of modified release opiates at step down to HDU. Conclusion(s): Oesophagectomy is major surgery and causes significant staff anxiety in low volume centres. This protocol has successfully standardised care for this patient group and allowed continuation of this essential service provision during the COVID-19 pandemic. This protocol improved 30 day mortality, reduced opiate use at step down to HDU and improved ICU staff perceived confidence in caring for post-operative oseophagectomy patients.
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic is a challenge for health practitioners, where there are many suspected and confirmed patients with COVID-19, including obstetric patients. Perioperative treatment of COVID-19 patients must be under applicable standards, for both patients and the medical personnel. Personal protective equipment is essential for health workers who treat patients with COVID-19 to prevent the transmission of the virus. The method of delivery ideally should be adapted to the clinical condition of the patient. At the same time, the management of anesthesia for patients with cesarean sections should also be adjusted to the patient's clinical condition by taking into consideration the availability of facilities and infrastructure that we have. Through this report, we want to show how we manage COVID-19 in obstetric cases using the available resources in a third-world country.Copyright © 2021 Bali Journal of Anesthesiology. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: To help combat the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic, elective inpatient procedures have been reduced. The authors hypothesized that a nationwide lockdown would negatively affect the postoperative outcome after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) due to reduced physiotherapy as well as restrictions in external facilities of physiotherapy and rehabilitation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, comparative study including 41 patients who had undergone primary TKA during the first lockdown of the COVID-19 pandemic from March 2020 to April 2020 and a comparable control group consisting of 47 patients with a minimum follow-up of 6 months before the COVID-19 pandemic from 2019. Relevant end points were the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Knee Society Function Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and range of motion (ROM). RESULTS: The lockdown group had a significantly worse outcome compared to the control group 6 months after TKA regarding WOMAC (p = 0.001), KSS (p < 0.001), OKS (p < 0.001), and length of hospital stay (p < 0.001). We found no statistically significant difference between the groups in ROM (p = 0.132), KSFS (p = 0.933), VAS at rest (p = 0.9.22), and exercise (p = 0.304). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected early clinical outcome parameters of elective primary TKA at 6 months of follow-up due to restrictions in postoperative care. We believe that standardized protocols for physiotherapy will improve clinical outcomes for TKA in the event of future lockdowns and underline the importance of appropriate postoperative care during this pandemic.
ABSTRACT
Case Report: It is well documented that Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) patients who suffer cardiac injury have a higher mortality rate, however the exact mechanism of cardiac injury and potential complications are still unknown. Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy (TCM), which was first described in 1990 in Japan, is characterized by a transient systolic and diastolic left ventricular dysfunction with a range of wall motion abnormalities predominantly affecting women often following an emotional or physical trigger. Though TCM is seen less commonly as a cardiac complication of COVID-19, with increasing rates of cardiovascular events due to COVID-19, TCM should be taken into consideration as a potential diagnosis for a COVID-19 positive patient. Case Description: The case of a 75-year old female with a history significant for hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease presented to the Emergency Department after a ground level fall and subsequent left hip pain. Upon primary survey, EKG showed persistent sinus tachycardia in the 130-150s, with intermittent borderline dynamic changes and a troponin that was mildly elevated at 0.10, and an initial false negative COVID-19 test. Preoperative echocardiogram showed normal left ventricle size, no regional wall abnormalities, and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 60-65%. In post-operative care, EKG illustrated dynamic changes in the form of ST elevation in the lateral precordial leads, as well as an increase in the cardiac troponins, from 0.07 to 3.51. A subsequent echocardiogram illustrated a drop in her ejection fraction from 60-65% to 30-35%, with evidence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction that was not noted on previous echocardiograms. Following the Mayo clinic diagnostic criteria, this patient met the diagnostic criteria for TCM, as evident by new electrocardiograph findings, non-obstructive cardiac catherization findings, echocardiogram findings illustrating transient left ventricular systolic dysfunction, modest elevations in cardiac troponins as well as the patient being a post-menopausal female. Subsequent echocardiogram on 2 week follow up showed a rebound in her ejection fraction to 50-55%. Discussion(s): Possible outcomes of TCM include cardiogenic shock, respiratory failure, and death. It is imperative that clinicians consider TCM as a possible diagnosis when treating COVID-19 patients that may be exhibiting cardiac complications. Frequent ECG monitoring and a vigilant differential should include TCM in patients presenting with COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
Background: Bipolar electrocautery tonsillectomy has been the preferred technique for many otolaryngologists, yet coblation tonsillectomy is gaining popularity in the current practice. This study aims at comparing both techniques in terms of pain, bleeding, and healing. Result(s): A total of 120 patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. Overall mean pain score associated with coblation tonsillectomy was statistically less than that caused by bipolar electrocautery throughout the follow-up period (p < 0.001). The difference in pain duration was statistically longer for the bipolar group. The incidence of postoperative hemorrhage-both reactionary and secondary-was statistically higher in the bipolar group. Coblation tonsillectomy showed statistically shorter duration of healing (p < 0.001). Conclusion(s): Coblation tonsillectomy is associated with less pain severity and shorter pain duration, fewer bleeding incidents, and more prompt healing.Copyright © 2022, The Author(s).
ABSTRACT
Background: During the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, intensive care unit (ICU) capacity was scarce. Since surgical patients also require ICU admission, determining which factors lead to an increased risk of postoperative ICU admission is essential. This study aims to determine which factors led to an increased risk of unplanned postoperative ICU admission during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This multicentre retrospective cohort study investigated all patients who underwent surgery between 9 March 2020 and 30 June 2020. The primary endpoint was the number of surgical patients requiring postoperative ICU admission. The secondary endpoint was to determine factors leading to an increased risk of unplanned postoperative ICU admission, calculated by multivariate analysis with odds ratios (OR's) and 95% confidence (CI) intervals. Results: One hundred eighty-five (4.6%) of the 4051 included patients required unplanned postoperative ICU admission. COVID-19 positive patients were at an increased risk of being admitted to the ICU compared to COVID-19 negative (OR 3.14; 95% CI 1.06-9.33; p = 0.040) and untested patients (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.32-0.70; p = 0.001). Other predictors were male gender (OR 1.36; 95% CI 1.02-1.82; p = 0.046), body mass index (BMI) (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.02-1.08; p = 0.001), surgical urgency and surgical discipline. Conclusion: A confirmed COVID-19 infection, male gender, elevated BMI, surgical urgency, and surgical discipline were independent factors for an increased risk of unplanned postoperative ICU admission. In the event of similar pandemics, postponing surgery in patients with an increased risk of postoperative ICU admission may be considered.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: In breast cancer (BC) patients receiving mastectomy, postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) improves long-term outcomes by decreasing local failure and cancer mortality. However, the optimal PMRT schedule is still under investigation. The present review aims to discuss the evidence regarding hypofractionated (HF) PMRT in BC patients in order to identify the optimal treatment approach. Additional purpose is to highlight what we have learned from COVID-19 era regarding HF schedules for PMRT in BC patients. Mechanism: Between February and November 2021, literature and database research were conducted. Key references were detected from a PubMed query. Range of publication date was between 2000 and 2021. Selection criteria included English language publications in humans. Hand searching included meeting proceedings of the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO). The website clinicaltrials.gov was also searched. Randomized controlled trials evaluating HF-PMRT were included. Findings in brief: Our research returned 87 published papers. Fourteen trials were included in our final analysis. The comparisons of several different schedules of HF-PMRT with conventional fractionated PMRT provided similar results in terms of locoregional disease control without increasing toxicity. Particularly, an acute skin toxicity incidence grade 2 or higher ranged between 10 and 25% among the studies we analyzed. Conclusion(s): The present paper suggests that safety and efficacy of HF-PMRT is comparable with conventional schedules and standard practice guidelines are already available. COVID-19 pandemic has emphasised the need for increasingly tailored treatment protocols. Modern HF regimens should continue to be the standard of treatment in BC patients who receive PMRT also in the post-COVID-19 era.Copyright © 2023 The Author(s).
ABSTRACT
Cardiac anesthesia and postoperative care in cardiac surgery have their specifics, which differ from other specialties. The last two years marked by the COVID-19 pandemic were associated with a slowdown in elective cardiac surgery. Currently, the number of procedures is increasing again. New drugs are tested, new guidelines are published, innovative and hybrid procedures are performed, with the goal of reducing invasiveness for the patients. The aim of this review is to present readers with the important outputs of publications related to cardiac anesthesia, postoperative care in cardiac surgery, and the use of extracorporeal circulatory support over the past year.Copyright © 2022, Czech Medical Association J.E. Purkyne. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to investigate the effects of first dressing changes on the postoperative pain intensity and the duration of pain in patients after anorectal surgeries to provide evidence for improving postoperative pain control. A total of 164 patients with an anorectal disease scheduled to undergo surgery were enrolled in this study, and their postoperative pain levels and duration were recorded. The status of severe pain for a rating score 7 during hospitalization after surgery was considered as the study endpoint. The pain score at the first dressing change was recorded and considered a potential risk factor for predicting severe pain during hospitalization by logistic regression analysis. Comparisons of postoperative pain outcomes between patients with a pain rating score 7 or <7 were performed before and after propensity score matching. Severe pain (rating score 7) at the first dressing change was an independent risk factor for severe pain during hospitalization (odds ratio (OR) = 8.33, p < 0.001). Pain on the first night after surgery in the Severe group was higher than in the Non-Severe group (3.2 +or- 0.9 vs. 2.8 +or- 1.0, p = 0.006). Patients in the Severe group had higher pain number rating scale (NRS) scores at the second (5.2 +or- 1.3 vs. 3.1 +or- 1.2, p < 0.001) and third (3.5 +or- 1.5 vs. 1.9 +or- 0.9, p < 0.001) dressing change than those in the Non-Severe group. Moreover, the overall NRS pain score during hospitalization in the Severe group was significantly higher than the Non-Severe group (5.7 +or- 1.1 vs. 3.9 +or- 1.5, p < 0.001), and the incidence of severe postoperative pain during hospitalization was also higher (61.6% vs. 12.1%, p < 0.001). In addition, pain duration in the Severe group was significantly longer than in the Non-Severe group (10 (3, 18) vs. 5 (2, 10), p < 0.001). Regarding the distributions of propensity scores, the overall NRS pain score during hospitalization in the Severe group was significantly higher than in the Non-Severe group (5.7 +or- 1.1 vs. 3.8 +or- 1.4, p < 0.001), as well as a higher incidence in severe postoperative pain (61.2% vs. 7.5%, p < 0.001), which was accompanied by a significantly longer pain duration in the Severe group (10 (3, 18) vs. 5 (2, 10), p < 0.001). Moreover, subgroup analysis showed that patients in the Severe group had higher overall pain NRS scores than the Non-Severe group for both the Milligan-Morgan (5.6 +or- 1.5 vs. 4.0 +or- 1.1, p < 0.001) and Thread-ligating (5.8 +or- 1.4 vs. 3.9 +or- 1.0, p < 0.001) surgery groups. Pain intensity at the first dressing change was sociated with the intensity and duration of postoperative pain in patients who underwent anorectal surgery. Thus, proper actions are needed to relieve the pain intensity at the first dressing change.
ABSTRACT
Background: Shoulder joint diseases such as rotator cuff tear, adhesive capsulitis, calcific tendinitis, shoulder instability, and glenohumeral osteoarthritis often require surgical treatment. Surgical outcomes can change significantly depending on whether the postoperative rehabilitation was appropriately performed. Current Concepts: The focus of postoperative rehabilitation should be to remove pain and restore functional movement through improving the dynamic stability of the rotator cuff and shoulder muscles. However, rehabilitation should not include activities that aggravate the injury. Therefore, rehabilitation treatment should be carried out with gradual increments in exercise intensity. Postoperative rehabilitation is not only related to exercise but may also include drug administration, such as steroid injection. In particular, many investigations have been performed to identify the clinical risks and benefits of steroid injection after rotator cuff repair. Notably, telemedicine can be used as a solution for the problematic situations that have been caused by coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Discussion and Conclusion(s): A thorough understanding and appropriate application of postoperative rehabilitation protocols are essential to improve surgical outcomes.Copyright © Korean Medical Association.
ABSTRACT
Covid-19 Epidemic has significantly changed how hypospadias patients are delivered to healthcare services, particularly after hypospadias repairs (postoperative care). Some studies reported that using telemedicine schemes by sending digital documentation such as images and videos through cell phones can facilitate an assessment of postoperative monitoring of hypospadias patients. However, this approach raises various concerns, such as managing digital documentation of hypospadias patients, analyzing the data, and the security of individuals' health information. This study proposes a design of cloud-based architecture for early detection and postoperative monitoring of hypospadias patients to address the concerns above. The user acceptance test shows that most users agree that this application may be used for early detection, monitoring hypospadias patients, and helping capture videos and provide labeling to patients' data. © 2022 IEEE.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: In March 2020 a new viral pandemic was declared. As etiological factor a virus belonging to the coronavirus family was isolated. This virus was named SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19. This virus can cause different clinical frames, variating from mild symptomatology to cases of ARDS or death. Although the pandemic outbroke in China, COVID-19 had one of first hotspots in Italy, where the Public Health System needed a re-arrangement to face the disease. The incidence of oncological disease doesn't suffer any variation in relation to pandemics or emergency period, but need to be managed as soon as possible in every situation. In our maxillo-facial surgery Unit we continued our regular activities to treat all oncological patient that needed surgery during the pandemic. Because of the absence of knowledge about the COVID-19, first periods were very difficult to manage, due to the risk of infection of patients and health professionals. We decided to share our experience. Material(s) and Method(s): Between March and June 2020, 34 patients affected by head and neck cancer were admitted at our Unit. All patients underwent surgical treatment and were hospitalized until their situation guaranteed a safe discharge. Result(s): All patients treated for head and neck cancer underwent surgery. All the medical and nurse post-operative management was performed by health operators by using all the personal protective equipment (PPE) to prevent any possible infection. All contacts between patients and their family were suspended. During phase 1, all patients were submitted to a short verbal triage, measurements of physiological parameters and qualitative COVID-19 test. They were also screened by imaging to guarantee there were not any bronchopulmonary diseases referable to viral infections. During phase 2, patients were also screened by serological tests. During phase 3, all patients practiced oropharyngeal swap before being hospitalized. Discussion(s): During lockdown a re-arrangement of the management of oncological patients was mandatory. The difficulties were caused by the restriction of several activities that guarantee a normal health care system function. To date there is not a standardized therapeutic protocol to face the infection. Main therapies are symptomatic and a lot of patients need to be treated in ICUs. To prevent any possible infections, surgical activities were reserved only for urgent disease that cannot be delayed. In our Unit we continued to manage oncological patients. Social distancing and confinement measures were necessary and mandatory, in order to manage our patients. During first phases we had not any valid instrument to totally exclude COVID-19 infection. During phase 3, when oropharyngeal swaps were introduced in the screening of our patients, we could start to work in a safer way. Conclusion(s): There are still a lot of difficulties in the management of patients during COVID 19 pandemic. Because of the important consequences deriving from the delay of oncological patients their management must to be clearly defined.Copyright © 2021
ABSTRACT
Background: Shoulder joint diseases such as rotator cuff tear, adhesive capsulitis, calcific tendinitis, shoulder instability, and glenohumeral osteoarthritis often require surgical treatment. Surgical outcomes can change significantly depending on whether the postoperative rehabilitation was appropriately performed. Current Concepts: The focus of postoperative rehabilitation should be to remove pain and restore functional movement through improving the dynamic stability of the rotator cuff and shoulder muscles. However, rehabilitation should not include activities that aggravate the injury. Therefore, rehabilitation treatment should be carried out with gradual increments in exercise intensity. Postoperative rehabilitation is not only related to exercise but may also include drug administration, such as steroid injection. In particular, many investigations have been performed to identify the clinical risks and benefits of steroid injection after rotator cuff repair. Notably, telemedicine can be used as a solution for the problematic situations that have been caused by coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Discussion and Conclusion: A thorough understanding and appropriate application of postoperative rehabilitation protocols are essential to improve surgical outcomes. © Korean Medical Association.
ABSTRACT
Background: Shoulder joint diseases such as rotator cuff tear, adhesive capsulitis, calcific tendinitis, shoulder instability, and glenohumeral osteoarthritis often require surgical treatment. Surgical outcomes can change significantly depending on whether the postoperative rehabilitation was appropriately performed. Current Concepts: The focus of postoperative rehabilitation should be to remove pain and restore functional movement through improving the dynamic stability of the rotator cuff and shoulder muscles. However, rehabilitation should not include activities that aggravate the injury. Therefore, rehabilitation treatment should be carried out with gradual increments in exercise intensity. Postoperative rehabilitation is not only related to exercise but may also include drug administration, such as steroid injection. In particular, many investigations have been performed to identify the clinical risks and benefits of steroid injection after rotator cuff repair. Notably, telemedicine can be used as a solution for the problematic situations that have been caused by coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Discussion and Conclusion: A thorough understanding and appropriate application of postoperative rehabilitation protocols are essential to improve surgical outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in delayed provision of essential and nonessential medical care. The objective of this study was to identify trends and possible delays in the timing of pediatric cochlear implant (CI) preand postoperative care during COVID-19 compared with pre- COVID at a single center. Method(s): Patients under the age of 18 years old who underwent initial CI at a single tertiary care center between January 1, 2016, and February 29, 2020, were included in the pre- COVID-19 group, and patients implanted between March 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021, were included in the COVID- 19 group. Data from revision or sequential second-side CI surgeries were excluded. Time intervals between care milestones including confirmation of severe to profound hearing loss, CI surgery, and CI activation were compared for the pre- COVID-19 and COVID-19 groups, as were the number and type (virtual vs in person) of postoperative visits. Result(s): A total of 98 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 70 were implanted pre-COVID and 28 during COVID. At the time of first CI, patients in the COVID group were significantly older (mu=5.7 years, 95% CI, 4.0-7.5) compared with patients in the pre-COVID group (mu=3.7 years, 95% CI, 2.9-4.6;P=.02). The interval between severe to profound hearing loss confirmation and first CI surgery was significantly longer for the COVID group (mu=99.7 weeks, 95% CI, 48.8-150) compared with the pre-COVID group (mu=54.2 weeks, 95% CI, 39.6-68.8;P=.02). All patients underwent activation within 7 weeks after implantation, although the time between first CI surgery and activation was significantly shorter for the COVID group (mu=3.8 weeks, 95% CI, 3.6-4.0) compared with the pre-COVID group (mu=4.3 weeks, 95% CI, 4.1-4.5;P=.01). Conclusion(s): Pediatric patients undergoing cochlear implantation during the COVID-19 pandemic experienced significant delays in care. Future work will aim to reveal impact of delayed care on outcomes in this population.
ABSTRACT
Purpose : Microincision vitrectomy surgery (MIVS) studies have shown low complication rates. In the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic and rural satellite clinics, we investigated the role of telemedicine as an alternative to postoperative visit (POV) regimens after uncomplicated MIVS. Methods : This IRB approved, prospective single-site, and single-surgeon study included patients without any history of glaucoma, ocular trauma, or severe systemic or ocular disease who underwent uncomplicated MIVS for any indication between January-August 2021. Prophylactic topical pressure-lowering drops were prescribed if POV intraocular pressure (IOP) was ≥22 mmHg. POVs included the same day after surgery, week(s) 1, 2, 8, and 12. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) into two arms: telemedicine (TM) or In-person (IP). Weeks 1 and 8 POV utilized protocol-based and questionnaire guided undilated exams performed by an ophthalmology fellow that were conducted either TM or IP, according to arm assignment. Any patients with concerning symptoms identified at these visits were scheduled for dilated exams with the surgeon. All patients underwent dilated exams performed by the surgeon on the same day after surgery, weeks 2 and 12. Primary endpoint was mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Secondary endpoints included changes in intraocular pressure (IOP), retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, and number of additional visits. Statistical analysis included Mann Whitney U and chi-square tests. Results : Fifty-two eyes from 50 patients (33 female, 17 male;p-value=0.02) with mean ages of 68.4±6.8 years underwent 55 total surgeries with 25 or 27G MIVS platforms. Forty-seven patients have completed all POVs. Mean preop BCVA logMAR was 0.53±0.55 and 0.40±0.45, and at 12 weeks, they were 0.39±0.45 and 0.26±0.33 for the TM and IP groups, respectively. No significant between-group differences were found for primary or secondary outcomes. All cases of abnormal IOP resolved by the following POV with pressure lowering drops. Concerning symptoms were identified in five patients requiring additional visits, revealing two cases of worsening macular edema (1 TM and 1 IP) and one case each of cataract progression (TM), vitreous hemorrhage (IP), and macular hole recurrence (TM). No complications presented at the TM or IP visits. Conclusions : Telemedicine-assisted POV regimens may be a safe and convenient alternative for patients undergoing uncomplicated MIVS.